Talk:Evasion

"Pseudo-evasion"
I was thinking about adding Backtrack under a "pseudo-evasion" section. Is it relevant, or is the mention of it in the top blurb enough?--Clockwork757 (talk) 16:29, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I was wondering the best course of action myself. Making a separate section may seem too much for one ability, but if people come here looking for all sources of evasion, they may not look in the opening paragraph.
 * --PimpadelicX (talk) 21:09, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

i think labeling backtrack as evasion is not productive to explaining it. It is its own thing. It is Faceless Voids own special ability, much life Lifestealer having a spell that makes spells give lifesteal and so on.

Incapacitating Bite
What about Incapacitating Bite? --99.9.240.146 06:38, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Incap bite is considered a blind according to this wiki currently. perhaps considered combing all sources of evasion cause they all make you miss right clicks.

Adding a True Strike Section
What about adding a section for True Strike and sources of it (e.g. MKB, Tusk's Walrus Punch and Silver Edge's attack to break the invisibility)? And btw, I could do that, if it's appreciated. Psion1C (talk) 15:55, 5 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Sure, go ahead. It makes most sense in this article. Bu3ny (talk) 17:01, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Accuracy
Totally missed that this page already includes true strike. My bad! The accuracy talk page is still existent btw, you might want to get rid of it as well.

While we're at it, isn't accuracy more like a status effect like Blind and better fits there? Molldust (talk) 20:07, 18 December 2015 (UTC)


 * It's better to keep them at one place. People prefer to have all the things at the same place. I'd rather consider putting blind and evasion together, since they basically are about the same thing, attacks missing. Bu3ny (talk) 20:11, 18 December 2015 (UTC)