Talk:Hero Difficulty

Chen vs Enchantress
Chen requires more micro than Enchantress?
 * I would say so. Not only does Chen have more creeps to control at once, he also has more active spells to use.
 * --PimpadelicX (talk) 08:43, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Editability
I assumed this page was taken directly from PlayDota (that's why it has a source link at the top), but I see a lot of people in the history editing this to add their opinion. Should this page not stay as the original author wrote? --PimpadelicX (talk) 08:56, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I've decided to change it back to the way it originally was. Nobody really edits this page, so I doubt anyone will read this for a while. If you're reading this, hats off to you for actually reading the Discussions page.
 * --PimpadelicX (talk) 06:49, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

SF's and Io's survival priority
Well, there's written that Shadow Fiend's survival priority is 3, which means "Stay long enough in battle to do enough harm". But imo SF must not die in battle at all. When he dies, he loses souls. Those 18 lost souls (if you died with full 36) mean you have to farm them again. And when you have less souls you are more likely to die again because of lacking damage. Then you have to farm again, but now you need to farm 27 souls... What I mean, a death pulls SF back for 2-3 mins, and that's awful for such a hero.

So I propose to change SF's survival prority to 5.

Also Io's survival priority is 2, so he "Just needs some quick seconds to throw all spells and do the job". Well, what about his 3rd skill when connected to the main carry? It is a massive DPS increase for him (main carry), so wisp's team is more likely to win the battle. I guess survival priority of wisp should be changed to 4 ("Stay long enough in battle to continuously support team").

That's all for now, tell me if I am right or not :)


 * The argument for survival priority being 3 is that his death causes his ultimate to cast again, dealing even more damage to nearby enemies, potentially turning a fight. Also, while collecting souls can be annoying after death, it is not very difficult in the mid-late game, and he will most likely be farming anyway because he's the carry.
 * As for, it is a support and it's life is expandable. While it is very helpful to have the in play, if we're basing this off of the hero priority, I would not sacrifice Level 3 priority heroes such as , , or  to save an Io's life. Every hero is useful when they are alive, but if someone has to die, I would make it a support whose money loss does not affect the team as heavily.
 * But anyone can make an argument to change the position of certain heroes, because Dota is a complex game. I would say is normally an expandable hero, but if he has an  he becomes a much more vital asset to the team, especially a team fight oriented team. In my opinion, I would leave it as is because everyone has their own opinions, and this guide is supposed to be the opinion of R.B. Economy from PlayDota.
 * --PimpadelicX (talk) 09:22, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

This page is weird
I added this note to the general wiki discussion, but I should add it here as well.

This is an odd duck. It really belongs in userspace, I think, but I respect Pigbuster's decision to dissociate himself from it. I think linking to it from the front page is a poor idea. The idea behind community guides was that the creator exercised total control, but with a single officially blessed hero difficulty guide it's not clear how disagreements should be arbitrated. Should it be a free-for all? Should R.B. Economy have the last word forever? What about the fact that R.B. Economy hasn't updated his guide since 2011? There are no good answers except to remove the guide entirely, which I'm reluctant to do unilaterally. Until consensus is reached on a solution, I think I'll take up PimpadelicX on his proposal to revert and lock, and add a disclaimer to the top of the page. I don't feel strongly about this, so feel free to overrule me. --Kroocsiogsi (talk) 23:28, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I would just delete it - Lemoncream (talk) 02:32, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Small mistake in the table
Tinker - 4 5 4 4 3 4 The sum of that is 24, not 25.