Talk:Heroes

Dota 2 Test Client
Can we agree not to add Heroes that are available in the Test client until they show up in the proper beta client? They still feel more appropriate in Unreleased Content.
 * Agreed. Bane is still on the Unreleased page and he should stay that way. Nickoladze 00:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Heroes don't go to the released table until they hit the main client. However any info found about them can be added to their pages (such as icons, bio, etc) -ChocolateWaffle 00:54, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Agreed. Faraday 06:08, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I started this discussion, but if people are going to remove heroes (Here, Brewmaster) from Unreleased Content because of the test release, then we may as well move them here than not have them anywhere. This is especially true now that there's only a day between Test -> Release patches. More importantly, I've put Brewmaster in Dire where Valve has placed him. They haven't specified whether it's intentional or not, but his lore doesn't go either way.--Sarcophallus 23:44, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Sortable hero table
I've begun work on User:Jrr/HeroTable.. anyone want to help with it / promote to a real page? What other columns should be included?

--Jrr 04:59, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

What sick man left heroes out my hero jar?!
Smashman has suggested that we alter this page and make a distinction between which heroes are and aren't currently in-game. I don't really know who is and isn't, not being in the beta and all... so I'm leaving this note here in case someone else fancies doing it. RJackson 19:55, 29 September 2011 (CDT)

Voice Actors
How should we go about mentioning the voice actors? Should we put it under trivia, like on Pudge, Tinker and Lich's pages, or just mention it in the summary like on Anti-Mage's page? -HTML Earth 06:52, 19 October 2011 (CDT)
 * It's still not decided, as we don't know all the voice actors. It could go either on the Trivia or the Bio. -ChocolateWaffle 07:15, 19 October 2011 (CDT)
 * I've gone ahead and added all of the obvious ones that I know of to the trivia sections. -HTML Earth 14:44, 19 October 2011 (CDT)

Hero Count
Can someone add a count for all the heroes in the game?
 * As of this post, there are 66 Heroes in game, evenly split 33/33 for Radiant/Dire. There are 108 in DotA. -Lancey 19:20, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Strength Heroes pigeonholed
Strength Heros are not mostly Initiators or tanks( not a role) Check the current list; almost half the heros are pure carries, which many more having great semi carry potential. Many of the heros, especially the ones considered initiators also have iconic skills that are make them excellent gankers.

Hero NavBox
I've made the NavBox in an uncollapsed state the primary thing visible on this page. Does anyone have serious issues with this? It's by far the most clear way to display the heroes and so it should be topmost on the Heroes page, in my opinion. Decency 21:59, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't think it looks good there, there is already a table in the main page for quick access, so there is no need to shove another nav in people's faces there. If anything, leave the bottom ones expanded. -ChocolateWaffle 22:37, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Agreed. I really don't think it belongs there, as the page is already listing all heroes in the game and the main page contains the navbox. As well, the navbox is located at the bottom of this page. --Aradalf 00:36, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Adding star players to heroes
Someone on reddit asked for replays, where pros played a hero exceptionally well. This made me think about adding pros to the hero-boxes like heroes are added to the player-boxes as signature heroes. Any problems about that? — The preceding unsigned comment was added by U Rec Bighead (talk) • (contribs)


 * I don't think this should be put into the hero infoboxes. If it even belongs on the hero page at all, it should be at the bottom. The hero page is typically for gameplay information, but since we already have some trivia and strategy elements at the bottom, a "Notable Players" section would not, in my opinion, be amiss, and might even be a welcome feature for those looking to learn how to play better. -Baloroth 14:21, 8 June 2012 (UTC)


 * I dont' think this would add anything of value to articles and it alone is very subjective information. I vote no.  - RJ  17:37, 8 June 2012 (UTC)