Help talk:Notability guidelines

Open Review
These notability guidelines what content, within a specific scope, we allow to be documented on the Wiki; and as such they need to be reviewed to ensure they represent the community's general opinion on what should and should not be documented. - RJ 20:58, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Tournaments
Criteria for tournaments is yet to be determined. Please make your suggestions here. - RJ 20:58, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Teams
Please discuss and suggest revisions to the Teams criteria here. - RJ 20:58, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

I think the restrictions here are too serious. This would discount teams like Ice, PotM Bottom, and ROOT, for example. FIRE was big for a month or so before they became Complexity, but we wouldn't have been able to cover it. I think results are the biggest thing, whether we judge that by tournament success, stream views, or something else. Decency 05:26, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Players
Please discuss and suggest revisions to the Players criteria here. - RJ 20:58, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Broadcasters
Please discuss and suggest revisions to the Players criteria here. - RJ 20:58, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I like the proposed criterion. (That is: An official caster of a notable tournament.) --Kroocsiogsi 01:15, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Community websites
Criteria for community websites is yet to be determined. Please make your suggestions here. - RJ 20:58, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Threshold Alexa rank (i.e. top 200,000) with dedicated DotA/Dota 2 section? Officially affiliated with any notable (q.v.) team, tournament, or caster? --Kroocsiogsi 01:15, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Other comments
Any other comments relating to the notability guidelines are welcome in this section. - RJ 20:58, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
 * No idea on competitive stuff. Sorry. I endorse whatever redefhist says. --Kroocsiogsi 01:15, 23 June 2012 (UTC)